Report is from 2006 but as Westonman highlights the political parties are at it like everyone else. I suspect the 'morally repugnant' soundbite will do just that come back to bite him when the skeletons start coming out of the Tory cupboards.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labours-tax-dodge-on-sale-of-hq-saved-163210000-stamp-duty-427849.htmlQuote:
The Labour Party has been accused of depriving taxpayers of hundreds of thousands of pounds in stamp duty in the sale of its London headquarters, despite the Chancellor's clampdown on stamp duty avoidance schemes in his mini-budget last week.
The Independent on Sunday has learnt that Labour sold its Westminster headquarters this year using a specially created company. The device, which Labour insists is a normal commercial transaction, cost the Treasury about £210,000 in lost stamp duty.
I also take the view that the term is not aimed at the pensioner in the shires who phones and complains to HMRC as yet again they have cocked up his/her personal allowance or taken account of a perfectly legitimate expense which can be written down against tax but against the likes of Geldof and other extremely wealthy people who use corporate envelopes to purchase property in London with the express reason of avoiding stamp duty payments.
And lets not forget Ken Livingstone in the press of late. To counter that you can rest assured most Tory MP's are also using obscure rules (not available to the rest of us) to also avoid tax and that Nick Clegg is in his own right very,very rich (as an ex investment banker Boooooooo) so will also have been at it.
Whilst I don't begrudge pensioners a thing (I will be one myself in just over a decade) there is no denying that those who were prudent in so far as they purchased property and enjoyed the benefits of rampant HPI over the last few decades not to mention the returns they have got back on stock market investments in the (general) Bull market of the same period have done exceptionally well indeed.
It has not been named the baby boomer generation lightly.
A twenty someone today will never be able to achieve the same position at retirement and will most likely have to work into their 70's to be able to achieve any pension whatsoever, yet are being asked to pay today ever increasing taxes part of which go to support the older generations.
There is no getting away from the fact that there are
reasonably wealthy pensioners (the smart ones) who took advantage (as per my explanation above and I don't knock them for this) of the situation and are now sitting quite pretty. These are the ones who pay tax and will be subject to the changes in allowances and lets face these are only being re-aligned with what the working population pay as for years those over 65 have enjoyed more attractive personal allowances.
On the other end of the scale we have Mr and Mrs Smith who didn't see the benefit of HPI as they stayed in their council flat forsaking right to buy, never took out private pension provision or invested in equities and now only get the bog standard pension. These people will pay very little or no income tax at all.